King v. . R. R.’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1951
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Missouri Pac Co v. Ault · Cooper v. Reynolds · O'Brien v. People ex rel. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co. · Harvey v. Tyler · Franklin Union No. 4 v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This cause coming on to be heard upon plaintiff's demurrer to the answer of defendant, it is now considered and adjudged by the court that said demurrer be and the same is hereby sustained. It is further considered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff have and recover of defendant $2,500, with interest thereon from 21 March, 1921, and the further sum of $95.65, with interest from same date, and the cost of this action, to be taxed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. R. R. v. . Story“`No execution or process, other than on a judgment recovered by the United States against a carrier, shall be levied upon the property of any carrier where the cause of action on account of which the judgment was obtained grew out of the possession, use, control, or operation of any railroad or system of transportation by the President under Federal control.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. R. R. v. . Story
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.