184 N.C. App. 519 - State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Michigan · State v. Richardson · 163 N.C. App. 129 - State v. Roberson · State v. Knight · 22 N.C. App. 663 - State v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, an appellate court’s review of a trial court’s order on a motion to suppress is strictly limited to a determination of whether its findings are supported by competent evidence, and in turn, whether the findings support the trial court’s ultimate conclusion. Where, however, the trial court’s findings of fact are not challenged on appeal, they are deemed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal. . . . Accordingly, we review the trial court’s order to determine only whether the findings of fact support the legal conclusion^]. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.