Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 N.C. App. 536 - State v. Hennis

184 N.C. App. 536 - State v. Hennis’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sledge · 57 N.C. App. 561 - State v. Hall · State v. MacOn · State v. Lee · 135 N.C. App. 449 - State v. Shuler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In State v. Shuler , 135 N.C.App. 449 , 520 S.E.2d 585 (1999), this Court determined that evidence is "introduced," within the meaning of Rule 10, when the cross-examiner either formally offers the material into evidence, or when the cross-examiner presents new matter to the jury that is not relevant to the case. Id . at 453, 520 S.E.2d at 588 ; see also State v. Wells , 171 N.C.App. 136 , 138, 613 S.E.2d 705 , 706 (2005) (quoting Shuler , 135 N.C.App. at 453 , 520 S.E.2d at 588 ). However, "[n]ew matters raised during the cross-examination, which are relevant, do not constitute the 'introduction' of evidence within the meaning of Rule 10." Shuler , 135 N.C.App. at 453 , 520 S.E.2d at 588 . Most recently, in State v. Bell , 179 N.C.App. 430 , 633 S.E.2d 712 (2006), this Court stated that evidence is introduced during cross-examination when: "(1) it is 'offered' into evidence by the cross-examiner; or (2) the cross-examination introduces new matter that is not relevant to any issue in the case." Id . at 431, 633 S.E.2d at 713 (citing Shuler , 135 N.C.App. at 452 -53 , 520 S.E.2d at 588 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Shuler , 135 N.C.App. at 453 , 520 S.E.2d at 588 . Most recently, in State v. Bell , 179 N.C.App. 430 , 633 S.E.2d 712 (2006), this Court stated that evidence is introduced during cross-examination when:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) it is 'offered' into evidence by the cross-examiner; or (2) the cross-examination introduces new matter that is not relevant to any issue in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.