State v. McAllister’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district · 48 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 3401 (Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978) · 12 U.S.C. § 3407 · 12 U.S.C. § 3413
Relies on Katz v. United States · Schmerber v. State of California · Boyd v. United States · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A grand jury’s] power to investigate would be feeble indeed if the grand jury had to know at the outset everything needed to arrest a man or to invade his home. Nor would it serve the public interest to stay a probe until the grand jury reveals what it has or what it seeks. Such disclosures could defeat the inquiry and impede the apprehension of the culprit. This is one of the reasons why the law cloaks the grand juiy investigation with secrecy. [Ibid]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Reid“the Federal Constitution does not recognize an expectation of privacy in bank records and does not give citizens recourse to challenge the federal government's acquisition of their bank records from their banks, even if that acquisition involves egregious misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`A bank customer may not care that employees of the bank know a lot about his financial affairs, but it does not follow that he is indifferent to having those affairs broadcast to the world or disclosed to the government.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.