State v. Abdullah’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
57
cited by 57 later decisions
7
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
57 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · McMillan v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“aggravating factors (3), (6), and (9) ... [may be] the basis for increasing defendant's sentence above the presumptive”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the `statutory maximum' for Blakely and Booker purposes is the presumptive sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[aggravating factors (3), (6), and (9), arguably, are inextricably linked to the recidivism exception. In a discretionary sentencing system in which the court decides the weight to give to a prior criminal conviction and how high on the scale to increase the sentence, the court naturally would consider the risk a defendant will re-offend and the need to deter. We do not know what value a court can give to a criminal conviction in our system without considering those factors. [Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.