184 Ohio App. 3d 39 - State v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · United States v. O'Brien · Troxel v. Granville · New York v. Ferber · In re Murray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although we are only concerned with a violation under R.C. 2907.323(A)(1), we find the Osborne case to be definitive and binding upon the constitutional issues presented sub judice. In State v. Graves, 184 Ohio App.3d 39 , 2009-Ohio-974 (4th Dist.2009), ¶ 9, out brethren from the Fourth District stated the following: Before we go further, we point out that both Young and Osborne involved R.C. 2907.323(A)(3), not subsection (A)(1). However, this fact makes no difference for purposes of our analysis. This court has previously held that the same”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.