Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Ohio App. 3d 764 - State v. Irwin

184 Ohio App. 3d 764 - State v. Irwin’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · Smith v. Phillips · State v. Adams · State v. Calhoun

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a court, without adequate justification, orders the defendant to wear shackles that will be seen by the jury, the defendant need not demonstrate actual prejudice to make out a due process violation. The State must prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt that the [shackling] error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.