Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Okla. 264 - McCully v. McCully

McCully v. McCully’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2000

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

5019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Noble · Cuff v. Koslosky · Messick v. Johnson · Williams v. Seminole County Oil & Gas Co. · West v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accrued royalty is personal property. Unacerued royalty, or royalty to accrue is a part of the estate remaining in the lessor and is real property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.