Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Okla. 299 - Seifried v. State Ex Rel. Bash

Seifried v. State Ex Rel. Bash’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2001

9 state decisions

2019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. National Bank of Commerce of Shawnee · Burke and Brown v. Territory of Oklahoma · Ex Parte Hibler · 31 Okla. Crim. 419 - Blanton v. State · 7 Okla. Crim. 668 - Flathers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any willful disobedience of any process or order lawfully made by any court in this state, not committed in immediate view and presence of the court, is an indirect contempt of court. In such cases contemnor must be proceeded against by written accusation, and upon demand shall be granted a jury trial. . . . “A civil contempt proceeding is prosecuted in the original action and in the name of the injured party and for his benefit. “In a proceeding to punish for indirect contempt, where the complaint or information sets forth facts in writing in sufficient language to fully and clearly inform the party charged of the kind of contempt charged against him and the particular acts constituting the contempt charged, the complaint or information will be held to be sufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fagin v. Thoroughman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.