State v. Cutri’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]henever it appears that an appeal cannot be prosecuted, by reason of the loss or destruction, through no fault of the appellant, of the reporter's notes or audio records *** necessary to the prosecution of the appeal[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“show[s] that they have made every reasonable effort to secure a substitute for the missing portion of the record and (2) *** make[s] a prima facie showing of error, of unfairness at trial, or of a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.