Treverrow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Appellant insists that the search warrant was not properly issued since it was based solely upon hearsay evidence, or stated another way, that some circumstances other than information received from a confidential informer are necessary to support an affidavit for a search warrant. * * *”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 302 So. 2d 144 - State v. Middleton

2. “"On Wednesday, January 6, 1965, a reliable confidential informer told me that about two days prior to this date, he saw two metal drums containing fermented mash inside the above described premises."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 194 So. 2d 250 - Treverrow v. State