Collins v. McNutt’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McNaughton v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. · Cjl v. Mwb · In Re Forlenza · 952 So. 2d 1131 - Patrick v. Williams · Fordham v. Siderius
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"has made a child custody determination consistent with Section 30-3B-201 [involving jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination] or Section 30-3B-203 [involving jurisdiction to modify a custody determination made in another state] has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the determination until: "(1) A court of this state determines that neither the child, nor the child and one parent, nor the child and a person acting as a parent have a significant connection with this state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships ...."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"the fact that a parent remains in this state does not, in and of itself, establish continuing, exclusive jurisdiction. A court must still determine whether the child and at least one parent have a significant connection to this state and whether substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships. See Patrick v. Williams , 952 So.2d 1131 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has made a child custody determination consistent with Section 30-3B-201 [involving jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination] or Section 30-3B-203 [involving jurisdiction to modify a custody determination made in another state] has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the determination until:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.