184 So. 3d 235 - Cloud v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · 950 So. 2d 641 - Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP · 936 So. 2d 79 - State Ex Rel. At · Austin v. Fibrebond Corp. · 637 So. 2d 607 - Barnes v. Cason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The love, affection, and other emotional ties between each party and the child. (2) The capacity and disposition of each party to give the child, love, affection, and spiritual guidance and to continue the education and rearing of the child. (3) The capacity and disposition of each party to provide the child with food, clothing,, medical care, and other material needs. (4)The length of time the child has lived in a stable, adequate, environment, and the desirability of maintaining continuity of that environment. • b(5) The permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or* proposed custodial home or homes. (6) The' moral fitness of each party, insofar as it affects the welfare of the child. (7).The mental and physical health of each party. (8) The home, school, and community history of the child. (9) The reasonable preference of the child,’if-the court deems the child to be of sufficient age to express a preference, (10) The willingness and ability of each party to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the child and the other ’ party. (11) The distance between the respective residences of the parties. (12) The responsibility for the care and rearing of the child previously exercised by each party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.