Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 SO3D 290 - Batiste v. State

Batiste v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Estes v. Texas · Parker v. Gladden · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 42 So. 3d 503 - Rowland v. State · 337 So. 2d 1242 - Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right to a fair trial by an impartial jury is fundamental and essential to our form of government. It is a right guaranteed by both the federal and the state constitutions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall have a right to ... a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the county where the offense was committed ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.