Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

184 S.W. 197

Large v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1916-03-08

<p>Criminal Law <&wkey;1090(l) — Questions Presented fob Review.</p> <p>Where there was nothing in a motion for new trial that could be considered in the absence of the testimony, and neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions was in the record, there was nothing to review on appeal.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, -see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1090(l).]</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1970

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1916-03-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAYIDSON, J.

¶1Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

¶2There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can be considered in the absence of the testimony, and nothing presented by bill of exceptions. In fact, there is neither a statement of the facts nor a bill of exceptions in the record.

¶3There being nothing to review in this appeal, the judgment will be affirmed.

/184/sw/197 · .json · Public domain