Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 SW 279 - Bain v. Polasek

Bain v. Polasek’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1941
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If appellant desired to know how he arrived at that result, he could have brought it out on the cross-examination, and he failed to do it. That evidence formed a sufficient basis for the judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.