Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 SW3D 103 - MacLin v. State

MacLin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sanders v. State · State v. Tokar · Deck v. State · Worthington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Forcibly steals”, a person “forcibly steals”, and thereby commits robbery, when, in the course of stealing, as defined in section 570.030, RSMo, he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person for the purpose of: (a) Preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention thereof immediately after the taking....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.