Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 SW3D 128 - Zeiser v. Tajkarimi

Zeiser v. Tajkarimi’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar Creek · Tuttle v. Muenks · Williams v. Mercantile Bank of St. Louis NA · Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan v. Bluecross Blueshield of Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a contract is ambiguous, then a question of fact arises as to the intent of the parties as to its meaning, and thus it is error to grant summary judgment. Rather, the determination of the parties' intent should be left to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We review the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and afford that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.