Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

184 S.W.3d 597

State v. Witherspoon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-02-28

Decided 2006-02-28

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Donnell Witherspoon (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of trafficking in the second degree, unlawful use of a weapon, and possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims the trial court erred in sentencing him as a persistent drug offender.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/184/sw3d/597 · .json · Public domain