Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 USAPPDC 324 - Dellums v. Powell

Dellums v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2008

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

901977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Moor v. County of Alameda · Eisenstadt v. Baker · District of Columbia v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the absence of evidence to the contrary, there is an inference that the actor remains in his general employment so long as, by the service rendered another, he is performing the business entrusted to him by the general employer. There is no inference that because the general employer has permitted a division of control, he has surrendered it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “excessive and unnecessary physical force * * *, whether or not they were furnished adequate nourishment, whether or not they were furnished with adequate shelter under reasonable conditions, bedding and toilet facilities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when he undertook to keep the peace on Capitol Hill pursuant to an agreement between the Capitol and Metropolitan Police. Consequently, to avoid liability the District must show that the United States had”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.