Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 WIS 290 - Palotta v. State

Palotta v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1976

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

40192419301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kube · State v. Green · Corscot v. State · Stecher v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When one has succeeded in defrauding another by means of false representations he should not be allowed to shield himself by the claim that his victim was less clever or more credulous than himself. Hence it is not the prevailing rule or the rule in this state that where all the other ingredients of the offense have been committed the defendant should be acquitted on the ground that the person defrauded failed to exercise ordinary care and prudence. The real question is not whether the representations are such as might deceive persons of ordinary care, but whether they are such as are adopted to deceive and do deceive the persons to whom they are made. Corscot v. State, 178 Wis. 661 , 190 N. W. 465 ; Stecher v. State, 168 Wis. 183 , 169 N. W. 287 . “It logically follows that it is not a necessary condition to conviction for this offense that there must be proof that the defrauded party has made investigation as to the truth of the representations relied on.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.