Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 W. Va. 317 - Stemple v. Dobson

184 W. Va. 317 - Stemple v. Dobson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
8
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 196 W. Va. 692 - Powderidge Unit Owners Ass'n v. Highland Properties, Ltd. (1996), 199 W. Va. 706 - Gaither v. City Hospital, Inc. (1997)

5 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

560199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 148 W. Va. 160 - Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New York · 162 W. Va. 116 - Harless v. First National Bank in Fairmont · 164 W. Va. 241 - Masinter v. Webco Co. · 167 W. Va. 272 - Lengyel v. Lint · 160 W. Va. 530 - Chapman v. Kane Transfer Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here a cause of action is based on tort or on a claim of fraud, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the injured person knows, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should know, of the nature of his injury, and determining that point in time is a question of fact to be answered by the jury.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A motion for summary judgment should be granted only when it is clear that there is no genuine issue of fact to be tried and inquiry concerning the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The existence of an 'as is’ clause in a contract of sale for real estate will not relieve the vendor of his obligation to disclose a condition which substantially affects the value or habitability of the property and which condition is known to the vendor, but not to the purchaser, and would not be disclosed by a reasonable and diligent inspection. Such failure to disclose constitutes fraud.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.