¶1— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in ordering respondent to pay petitioner rent and other charges *614due to petitioner from his tenant. The tenant was not a party to this proceeding. Respondent was the tenant’s sublessee. Petitioner was not in privity of contract because he was not a party to the lease between respondent and the tenant. In addition, because the tenant retained a reversionary interest in the sublease with respondent, there was no privity of estate between petitioner and respondent (see, New Amsterdam, Cas. Co. v National Union Fire Ins. Co., 266 NY 254). Because there was no privity between petitioner and respondent, petitioner cannot recover rent and other charges from respondent (see, Tefft v Apex Pawnbroking & Jewelry Co., 75 AD2d 891; see also, Stewart v Long Is. R. R. Co., 102 NY 601; 74 NY Jur 2d, Landlord and Tenant, § 719). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Eviction.) Present—Denman, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
185 A.D.2d 613
Decker v. Chuang
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1992-07-14
Decided 1992-07-14