Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 A.D.2d 824

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1992-08-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-08-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered October 4, 1990, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

¶3The defendant’s claim that charges arising from two separate incidents were improperly joined in one indictment is raised for the first time on appeal, and thus, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the offenses were properly joinable, pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c) (see, People v Edwards, 160 AD2d 720).

¶4Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was properly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.08; People v Herrar, 120 AD2d 614; People v Morse, 62 NY2d 205).

¶5The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Santucci, JJ., concur.

/185/ad2d/824 · .json · Public domain