Owen v. Owen’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1989
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Salyers v. Smith · Edwards v. Locke · Reynolds v. Balding · Boyd v. Lloyd · Jeffery v. Patton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘ ‘ This court is committed to the doctrine that, where a deed is executed in consideration of the agreement by the grantee to support the grantor, and this agreement is made by the grantee for the fraudulent purpose of securing the deed, and without intending to carry it out, and it has this effect, it constitutes a fraud vitiating the conveyance, and equity will set it aside. Salyers v. Smith, 67 Ark. 526 , 55 S. W. 936 ; Boyd v. Lloyd, 86 Ark. 169 , 110 S. W. 596 ; Edwards v. Locke, 134 Ark. 80 , 203 S. W. 286 ; Jeffery v. Patton, 182 Ark. 449 , 31 S. W. 2d 738 ; and Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Miller, 184 Ark. 415 , 42 S. W. 2d 564 . ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hendrix v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.