Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 Ark. 1111 - Parker v. Sims

Parker v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
3
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Alexander v. Alexander (1950), 2021 Ark. App. 49 - Deundrea Mathis v. State of Arkansas (2021)

62 state decisions

2001932194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cassady v. Norris · Boynton v. Ashabranner · Bank of Pine Bluff v. Levi · Womack v. Womack · James v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law is settled that the fraud which entitles a party to impeach a judgment must be fraud extrinsic of the matter tried in the cause, and does not consist of any false or fraudulent act or testimony the truth of which was or might have been in issue in the proceeding before the court which resulted in the judgment assailed. It must be a fraud practiced upon the court in the procurement of the judgment itself.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(c) Grounds for Setting Aside Judgment, Other Than Default Judgment, After Ninety Days. The court in which a judgment, other than a default judgment [which may be set aside in accordance with Rule 55(c)] has been rendered or order made shall have the power, after the expiration of ninety (90) days after the filing of said judgment with the clerk of the court, to vacate or modify such judgment or order: (4) For fraud practiced by the successful party in obtaining the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is the duty of a litigant to keep himself informed of the progress of his case, and a party seeking relief against a judgment on the ground of unavoidable casualty or misfortune preventing him from defending must show that he himself is not guilty of negligence, and he cannot have relief if the taking of the judgment appears to have been due to his own carelessness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.