In Re Cole’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2018
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on In Re Langley · In Re Grindal · In Re Dodge · In Re Carilli · In Re Brent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if I were to accept (for the moment) the proposition that a residence exemption can be established without prior occupancy, [the debtor] has demonstrated nothing more than a vague intention to live on the ... property and has shown no present plans or tangible, contemporary preparations to move there. That is not enough.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.