Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 Cal. 280 - Beeman v. Richardson

Beeman v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
August 1956
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 1956 · most notably People v. Dail (1943), Johnstone v. Morris (1930)

27 state decisions

1201921193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As to the finding of fraudulent representations, it is not necessary to detail all the representations which are alleged and found to have been made and the evidence concerning each. If the finding is sustained as to one material fraudulent representation, it is enough.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.