In re Kaster

Decided May 11, 1921

California Supreme Court · decided 1921-05-11

<p>[1] Habeas Corpus—Violation oe Motor Vehicle Act.—On this application for discharge of petitioner on habeas corpus after conviction of the violation of the Motor Vehicle Act, it is held that all points available to petitioner were correctly decided In re Kaster on Babeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal. App.), 198 Pac. 1029.</p>

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1939

8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1921-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THE COURT.

¶1The petitioner heretofore sought his discharge on habeas corpus on account of the matters alleged in his petition filed herein, at the hands of the district court of appeal of the third appellate district. After a hearing that court on May 2, 1921, discharged the writ and remanded the petitioner. The court in so doing filed a written opinion. (In re Kaster on Habeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal. App.), 198 Pac. 1029.) [1] All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.

¶2The application for a writ is denied.

¶3All the Justices concurred