Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 Colo. 369 - People v. Smith

People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably People v. Thatcher (1981), People v. Hedrick (1976)

30 state decisions

12019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Alderman v. United States · Giles v. State of Maryland · Maisel v. People · Cheatwood v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`* * * A criminal trial is not a game in which the State's function is to outwit and entrap its quarry. The State's pursuit is justice, not a victim. If it has in its exclusive possession specific, concrete evidence which is not merely cumulative or embellishing and which may exonerate the defendant or be of material importance to the defense—regardless of whether it relates to testimony which the State has caused to be given at trial—the State is obliged to bring it to the attention of the court and the defense. * * ' We are in agreement with the foregoing statement. See People v. Walker, 180 Colo. 184 ; 504 P.2d 1098 ; Cheatwood v. People, 164 Colo. 334 , 435 P.2d 402 . "Moreover, in our view the determination of usefulness of evidence in this context is a defense function, not a prosecutorial function. In certain cases even an in camera hearing imposes unfairness on the defense, as only the defense can determine what will be material and helpful to its case. See Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165 , 89 S.Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he thrust of our discovery rules is to discourage legal games of `blindman's bluff,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.