Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 CONN 573 - Johnson v. Johnson

Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
4
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably LaBow v. LaBow (1988), Paddock v. Paddock (1990)

49 state decisions

240198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bozzi v. Bozzi · Sanchione v. Sanchione · McGuinness v. McGuinness · Miller v. Miller · Jacobsen v. Jacobsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether a child is in need of maintenance and, if in need, the respective abilities of the parents to provide such maintenance and the amount thereof, the court shall consider the age, health, station, occupation, earning capacity, amount and sources of CT Page 13973 income, estate, vocational skills and employability of each of the parents, and the age, health, station, occupation, educational status and expectation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate and needs of the child.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It was to [the husband^s] benefit that the court postponed payment of $900 monthly when his financial statement indicated enough capital to cover the cost of the entire obligation. We do not view this order as contradictory but as an accommodation to the defendant during a time of transition in his life. The order was well within the discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Unless and to the extent that the decree precludes modification, any final order for the periodic payment of permanent alimony . . . may at any time thereafter be continued, set aside, altered or modified by said court upon a showing of a substantial change in the circumstances of either party . . ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.