IBBS v. Archer’s Empirical Analysis
185 F. 37 · 1911
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1934
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hardee v. Wilson · Masterson v. Herndon · Grand Island & W. C. R. v. Sweeney · Brown v. Pegram · Port v. Schloss Bros. & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think there should be a written notice and due service, or the record should show his appearance and refusal, and that the court on that ground granted an appeal to the party who prayed for it, as to his own interest. Such a proceeding would remove the objections made to permitting one to appeal without joining the other; that is, it would enable the court below to execute its decree, so Jar as it could be executed, on the party who refused to join, and it would estop that party from bringing another appeal for the same matter. The latter point is one to which this court has always attached much importance, and it has strictly adhered to the rule under which this ease must be dismissed, and also to the general proposition that no decree can be appealed from which is not final, in the sense of disposing of the whole matter in controversy, so far as it has been possible to adhere to it without hazarding the substantial rights of parties interested.” Hardee v. Wilson, 149 U. S. 179 , 13 Sup. Ct. 39 , 36 L. Ed. 933 ; Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U. S. 86 , 15 Sup. Ct. 15 , 39 L. Ed. 79 ; Loveless v. Ransom, 107 Fed. 626 , 46 C. C. A. 515 ; Provident Life & Trust Co. v. Camden et al., 177 Fed. 854 , 101 C. C. A. 68 ; Ibbs v. Archer, 185 Fed. 37 , 107 C. C. A. 141 ; Grand Island & W. C. R. Co. et al. v. Sweeney, 103 Fed. 342 , 43 C. C. A. 255 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.