Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 F.1d 985 - In re Tarbox

In re Tarbox’s Empirical Analysis

185 F. 985 · 1910

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
May 1926
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Mound Mines Co. v. Hawthorne · In re Hayden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plainly the trustee cannot enlarge the referee’s jurisdiction merely by alleging that the claim under which the property is held has not merits or is fraudulent, or by calling it ‘merely colorable,’ when no other reasons appear for so describing it than its alleged want of merit or fraudulent character.'’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.