F. H. Harbin and B. E. Harbin v. Richard E. Butler

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

November 29, 1950.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-11-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1964

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Beneficial Corp. v. Reading & Southwestern Street Railway Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville; Robert L. Taylor, Judge.

S. F. Dye, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellants.

Green, Webb & McCampbell, Knoxville, Tenn., H. H. McCampbell, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal has been duly heard and considered upon the record and upon the respective oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the appellant and for the appellee;

¶2

And it appearing that the judgment for the plaintiff, now appellee, on the verdict of the jury awarding him $5,000 damages, is supported by substantial evidence and that no error appears in the rulings of the District Court upon the trial.

¶3

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.