Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 F.2d 239

Docket No. 10757.

United States v. Armstrong

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-11-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1966

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Shelley v. Railroad Retirement Board

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

N. Vaden, U.S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

John Brown, Edward N. Vaden, Memphis, Tenn., Newell A. Clapp, H. G. Morison, and Morton Hollander, Washington D.C., John R. Gilliland, Memphis, Tenn., J.C. Rutschman, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon consideration thereof it appears to the court that there is no reversible error upon the record.

¶2

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment entered in the District Court and herein appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.

/185/f2d/239 · .json · Public domain