Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 F.2d 404

Docket No. 12725.

Hess v. Woods

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 8, 1950.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-11-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1950

1 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1G. G. Baumen, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Ed Dupree, Gen. Counsel, Leon J. Libeu, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nathan Siegel, Sp. Lit. Atty., OHE, all of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

¶3Austin Clapp, Los Angeles, Cal., amicus curiae.

¶4Bourke Jones, Asst. City Atty., City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Cal., for City of Los Angeles, amicus curiae.

¶5Before STEPHENS, BONE, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7The District Court denied an application for a temporary injunction against the continuing enforcement of The Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, and dismissed the action under which it was requested. The plaintiffs thereupon filed their notice of appeal to this court and applied for an immediate “restraining order” and “injunction” against the named defendants and against B. C. Koepke, Area Rent Director, and his subordinates. In short, we are asked to suspend all activity of an important governmental agency before the appeal is before us for adjudication as to whether the District Court should take jurisdiction and try the case on the merits. No order with such far-reaching consequences should be made by any court before the merits of the controversy have been tried and adjudicated.

¶8Petition denied.

/185/f2d/404 · .json · Public domain