Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 F.2d 470 - Gunton v. Squier

Gunton v. Squier’s Empirical Analysis

185 F.2d 470 · 1950

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
4
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Thomas v. Brewer (1991), Strand v. Schmittroth (1957)

42 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

19019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 709

Relies on Zerbst v. McPike · Hayden v. Warden, United States Penitentiary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who has violated the criminal statutes of both the Federal and State Governments may not complain of the order in which he is tried or punished for such offenses.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “his Federal sentence could not start to run until he was delivered to and received by the United States Marshal at the place of detention to await transportation to the Federal penitentiary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.