Fannie Maddux v. Roscoe L. Edwards, Trustee

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Oct. 17, 1950.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-10-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1950

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 11 Smith & H. 100 - North v. Puckett · Edwards v. Hawks · In re Maddux

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-10-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

J.L.Stern, Ernest B. King, Bristol, Tenn., for appellants.

Jos. K. Brown, Bristol, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and motion of appellants to be allowed to file reply brief, oral argument having been waived by the parties.

¶2

Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered that the motion of appellants for leave to file reply brief be sustained.

¶3

It is further ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, 94 F.Supp. 134. North v. Puckett, 164 Tenn. 100, 46 S.W.2d 73; Edwards v. Hawks, 189 Tenn. 17, 222 S.W.2d 28.