Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 F.2d 622 - Marshall v. Crotty

Marshall v. Crotty’s Empirical Analysis

185 F.2d 622 · 1950

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
October 1981
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently October 1981 · most notably Carter v. Seamans (1969), Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of Education (1963)

34 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

3801950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 460

Relies on St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Lynch v. United States · Tutun v. United States · Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes · United States v. Babcock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since the 1948 revision (of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), the courts have adhered to the view that Congress has not vested in the district courts original jurisdiction in cases of mandamus.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “confer power on the [lower] courts to issue mandamus in an original proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.