Loew's, Inc. v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis
185 F.2d 641 · 1950
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (1979), Alfredo G. Parrish, Etc. v. Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, Etc., Defendants- Alabama Black Lawyers Association v. Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, Etc., Defendants (1975)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on American Communications Ass'n v. Douds · Schneiderman v. United States · Sinclair v. United States · Communist Party of United States of America v. Peek · Eisler v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At all times commencing on the date hereof and continuing throughout the production or distribution of the pictures, the producer will con duct himself with due regard to the public conventions and morals and will not do anything which will tend to_ degrade him in society or bring him into public disi epute, contempt, scorn or ridicule, or that will tend to shock, insult or offend the community or public morals or decency or prejudice the corporation or the motion picture industry in general; and he will not wilfully do any act which will tend to lessen his capacity fully to comply with this agreement, or which will injure him physically or mentally.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[I]f certain evidential material, having a legitimate probative value, tends nevertheless to produce also, over and above its legitimate effect, an unfair prejudice to the opponent, * * * there is good ground for excluding such evidence, unless it is indispensable for its legitimate purpose.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.