Nick v. Dunlap

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

December 21, 1950.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-12-21

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1969

8 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elder W. Marshall, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elder W. Marshall and Bessie I. Marshall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Wm. H. Atwell, Judge.

J. Edwin Fleming, S. L. Mayo, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

Carlton Fox, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Frank B. Potter, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., O. Morris Harrell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Despite the vigorous contentions of appellant to the contrary, we are in no doubt that the decision of Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co., 338 U.S. 561, 70 S.Ct. 386, is controlling in this case. The judgment is

¶2

Affirmed.