Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 F.2d 755

Docket No. 10690.

Anglin v. Barron

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 18, 1950.

Decided Nov. 16, 1950.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-11-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1950

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Cohn v. Cohn

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by James McPherson Proctor · Decided 1950-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*756Mr. Mark P.- Friedlander, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Edward A. Aaron-son, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

¶2Mr. Carl H. Imlay, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Charles V. Imlay, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Barron.

¶3Messrs. George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty. and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D.C., entered appearances for appellee United States of America.

¶4Before PROCTOR and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT N. WILKIN, District Judge, retired (sitting by designation).

¶5PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

¶6This case involves conflicting claims between appellant, wife, and appellee, mother, of a deceased Naval veteran, to the benefits of his National Service Life Insurance. The mother was the named beneficiary in the policy. The wife lays her claim upon an alleged change made in her favor by the insured. The court, trying the case without a jury, found that no change had been effected and entered judgment in favor of the mother, appellee.

¶7In our opinion the trial court’s findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and the law. Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A.; Cohn v. Cohn, 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 171 F.2d 828.

¶8Affirmed.

/185/f2d/755 · .json · Public domain