Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

185 F.2d 853

Docket No. 11213.

Acker v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-12-04

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1951

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-12-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Howell Leuck, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Don C. Miller, Cleveland, Ohio and John J. Kane, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This cause has been heard and submitted on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of the respective attorneys for the appellant and the United States;

¶2

And it appearing that there was ample and abundant evidence to support the judgment of conviction and sentence, and that the trial court committed no reversible error in charging the jury, in admitting or excluding evidence, or in any procedural matter.

¶3

The judgment is affirmed.

/185/f2d/853 · .json · Public domain