Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 F.3d 887 - In re Sealed Case No. 99-3096

In re Sealed Case No. 99-3096’s Empirical Analysis

185 F.3d 887 · 1999

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
5
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Marshall v. Hendricks (2002), Randy Boss and Revell Boss v. Guy Pierce and Mark A. Pierson (2001)

13 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions

2401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “flipped” and started testifying against the defendant). 51 . Cf. id. at 893. The D.C. Circuit stated: In the usual case there is a conceptual difference between the impeachment of a government witness and the impeachment of a defense witness. Evidence that impeaches the former is almost invariably”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'The evidence at issue must be favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory or because it is impeaching; that evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and prejudice must have ensued'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the government has breached its obligations under Brady is a question of law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.