Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 FSUPP 401 - Rogers v. Smith

Rogers v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 1999
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A · 28 U.S.C. § 1345

Relies on United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. · Markham v. Cabell · Propper v. Clark · Harris v. Balk · Curry v. McCanless

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe that the Trading with the Enemy Act grants the authority necessary to vest obligations evidenced by domestic negotiable bearer debentures even though the debentures themselves are outside the United States. By s 7(c) of the Act, enacted during World War I, the President is given the authority to seize all enemy property, "including ... choses in action, and rights and claims of every character and description owing or belonging to ... an enemy....” At the beginning of World War II, Congress made an even broader grant of authority to the Executive through an amendment to s 5(b), providing that "any property or interest of any foreign country or national thereof shall vest, when, as, and upon the terms, directed by the President....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.