Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 IND 39 - Hight v. Carr

Hight v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2011

14 state decisions

4019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. Ramsey · McAdams v. Bailey · East Lewisburg Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Marsh · Starkey v. Starkey · Eissler v. Hoppel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘A party cannot occupy inconsistent positions; and, where one has an election between several inconsistent courses of action, he will be confined to that which he first adopts. Any decisive act of the party, done with knowledge of his rights and of the facts, determines his election and works an estoppel.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.