Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 Kan. 306 - Reda v. Lowe

Reda v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
October 1967
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Holm · Ziegelasch v. Durr · Fry v. Cadle · Ray v. Allen · Henks v. Panning

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In testing the sufficiency of evidence as against a demurrer, the evidence and the inferences that may be properly drawn therefrom must be considered in the light most favorable to the party against whom the demurrer is directed, and if the evidence and the inferences viewed in that manner are of such character that reasonable minds, in the exercise of fair and impartial judgment, may reach different conclusions thereon, the demurrer should be overruled and the issue submitted to the jury. (Creten v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Rid. Co., 184 Kan. 387 , 337 P. 2d 1003 .)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The trial court has a wide discretion as to the special questions to be submitted to the jury, and where it appears that a question is not intended to bring out some ultimate fact in the case it is proper to refuse to submit it.” (Syl. IT5.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.