Bunch v. Bunch’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1963
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goetz v. Goetz · Garver v. Garver · King v. King · Matlock v. Matlock · Meads v. Meads
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule in this jurisdiction has always been that a division of property made by the trial court in a divorce action will not be disturbed on appellate review unless it is clearly made to appear the trial court’s action in making that division amounted to an abuse of discretion.” (p. 253.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ward v. Ward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.