Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 La. 1032 - State v. Cooley

State v. Cooley’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1975

9 state decisions

4019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Young · State v. Barrett · State v. Quinn · State v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have, in the abundance of precaution, considered these bills, although, under the provisions of article 559 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the case of State v. Stephens, 183 La. 431 , 164 So. 162 , we might have dismissed them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.