Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 185 La. 855 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1999

20 state decisions

601936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Guidry · State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Fousek · State v. Hutchinson · 8 La. Ann. 109 - State v. Cazeau · State v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As to bill No. 2, if it be true that the crime of 'felony theft’ as denounced by the laws of Texas would not amount to a felony if committed in Louisiana, the motion to quash is good and should have been sustained by the trial judge, because it is perfectly clear that where Act No. 15 of 1928 is invoked in order to have a defendant sentenced as a second or third offender, and where it is alleged that he had been previously prosecuted and convicted of crimes committed in other states, it must be alleged and shown that those crimes, if committed in this State, would be felonies under our law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... So it is clear that if the defendant had committed in this State the crime known in Texas as `felony theft' he could, on conviction, have been sentenced to hard labor in the State Penitentiary for a term not exceeding two years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.